Search for: All records

Abstract Clay is the main component that contributes to sediment cohesiveness. Salinity impacts its transport, which controls the electrochemical force among the sediment grains. Here, we quantify the impacts of salinity on the erosion threshold, yield stress, and the microstructures of a fluorescently labeled smectite clay, laponite, by combining flume experiments, rheometer measurements, and macro‐ and microscopic imaging. We show that the critical shear stress for clay erosion,τ_b,crit, increases by one order of magnitude with increasing salinity when salinity <1.5 ppt and slightly decreases when salinity >1.5 ppt showing a weaker dependency upon salinity. We further show that the yield stress,τ_y, of the clay remains roughly a constant at salinity less than 1.5 ppt and decreases by over one order of magnitude at salinity larger than 1.5 ppt. This change in the dependency ofτ_b,critand yield stress on salinity corresponds to a change in the gelatinous state of clay, from gel‐like structures to phase‐separated structures as salinity increases. Our results provide a quantitative characterization of the dependency of clay erosion threshold and yield stress on salinity and highlight the importance of the clay gelatinous state in controlling clay transport. 

Abstract We present a critical analysis of experimental findings on vegetation–flow–sediment interactions obtained through both laboratory and field experiments on tidal and coastal environments. It is well established that aquatic vegetation provides a wide range of ecosystem services (e.g. protecting coastal communities from extreme events, reducing riverbank and coastal erosion, housing diverse ecosystems), and the effort to better understand such services has led to multiple approaches to reproduce the relevant physical processes through detailed laboratory experiments. State‐of‐the‐art measurement techniques allow researchers to measure velocity fields and sediment transport with high spatial and temporal resolution under well‐controlled flow conditions, yielding predictions for hydrodynamic and sediment transport scenarios that depend on simplified or bulk vegetation parameters. However, recent field studies have shown that some simplifications on the experimental setup (e.g. the use of rigid elements, a single diameter, a single element height, regular or staggered layout) can bias the outcome of the study, by either hiding or amplifying some of the relevant physical processes found in natural conditions. We discuss some observed cases of bias, including general practices that can lead to compromises associated with simplified assumptions. The analysis presented will identify potential pathways to move forward with laboratory and field measurements, which could better inform predictors to produce more robust, universal and accurate predictions on flow–vegetation–sediment interactions. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.